This link was provided by a local student who was researching how to be a good neighbor. He took the initiative to share it with us, so we are posting it here:
We are asking Arcadia Residents to send emails to the Arizona House of Representatives asking for a NO vote on SB 1387 (formerly HB 2333)
The original Home Base Business Bill (HB2333) died in committee and we thought we defeated it. Read the February 9th Position Letter from ACMNA here. [note: this letter was mailed to all State Senators in advance of a potential floor vote]
HOWEVER, now it has reappeared as a striker bill under a new identity as a SB1387. If allowed to pass, SB1387 would allow uncontrolled commercial encroachment in our neighborhoods.
- ANY home can be used for selling ANY lawful goods and services.
- In addition to family members (living in the home or not) a home business can have as many as 3 outside employees.
- Plus, the business owner does not need to be the home owner.
- WORST OF ALL, the entire house can be used as a business.
Read the bill here, it's not long but has serious implications for Arcadia or any residential neighborhood.
Most importantly, a list of emails and phone numbers for all State Legislatures is attached, please contact them (starting with the House) and let them know that SB1387 will devastate neighborhoods by removing the many zoning ordinances that currently exist to protect the residential character of our neighborhood.
Please share this information your neighbors and friends who live in Arizona.
Remember that “Home-Based Business” as referred to in SB 1387 means any business for the manufacture, provision or sale of goods or services that is owned and operated by the owner or tenant of the residential dwelling. There are 7 exceptions listed under C.3. near the bottom of page 5. of the Bill. Most of these are related to adult type businesses. The sale of guns is NOT an exception. Their sale WOULD be allowed. Is this what we want?
Representative email addresses at end of post to copy and paste, OR
Insight from a Expert Council and Legal Advisor from Washington D.C.: "OK, I read the bill text, but not thoroughly to come up with all problems. Still, I agree that it's a terrible bill that essentially takes away the authority of cities and towns to keep residential districts residential. That's a policy issue that obviously those who support this bill don't care about -- they probably don't want Phoenix or Flagstaff or Tucson "interfering" with businesses. But here are some critical points that I'd make:
1) There is a HUGE loophole in the bill where it says that the EMPLOYEES of the home business are limited to residents of the residential dwelling or immediate family of the residents, the owner of the business or his/her immediate family, must be the owner or immediate family, and not more than 3 individuals who are not residents of the residential dwelling. The loophole is that the limitation on EMPLOYEES is NOT a limitation on INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS. So if I run a home based business, it appears that I could hire 10 independent contractors (e.g., telephone sales people) to work out of my home. This is a complete end-run around the limitation on number of people who can work out of the home.
2) The business is allowed to have "zero or more clients" on the property at the same time. This is meaningless. This means that I could have a seminar for 10 clients in my home (as long as they take LightRail, park in my driveway, or park at a nearby meter or parking lot). Another huge loophole. (Combined with #1 above, imagine my 10 independent contractor salespeople running a seminar in my home for 10 potential clients -- 20 people in the home for commercial purposes)
3) The cities cannot require a business license. This makes enforcement of this law extremely difficult if not impossible. If they want to say that the cities can't charge more than $50 for a business license, well maybe OK. But to prohibit a city from even keeping track of home-based businesses by prohibiting the city from requiring the owner to get a business license means that the city will have no idea of what businesses are operating in residential neighborhoods.
4) Keep in mind that the definition of "home based business" includes a resident who is either the owner of the residential property OR a TENANT. So unless every landlord puts a restriction in his/her lease to prohibit businesses being operated out of a residence by the tenant (and then the landlord needs to enforce that restriction -- good luck!), the state is making it more difficult for actual OWNERS or residences to make sure their residential property isn't used by a tenant as a business. How unfair to residential property owners.
As a strategy, I would think that cities/towns like Paradise Valley, Carefee, Scottsdale (Troon?), etc (more "exclusive" municipalities) would be upset that the state is telling them that they can't prohibit home-based businesses with allegedly "no impact". Has anyone tried working with the residents of these municipalities to get them to target their Republican State Senators?? And what about Historic Districts in Phoenix and other cities-- are any of them represented by Republican Senators? Should residential areas in Historic Districts be required to allow home-based businesses?
Finally, personally I wouldn't have a problem if a home based business was defined as something like a business where someone does graphic designs from their home and emails to clients; or someone knits or paints at home and takes the product to their clients (or has AN OCCASIONAL client visit, like an average of 1 client per week); or is a business consultants with clients all over the US and who communicates with those clients by email or phone. But this bill goes way beyond these extremely minor situations and it has loopholes that you can drive a truck through."
COPY AND PASTE THESE EMAIL ADDRESSES INTO YOUR OPPOSITION EMAIL:
Thanks so much for your support!
Article Courtesy of Crystal DeVelis, Arcadia Osborn Neighborhood Association
If ever there was a time for action, it is now. There are proposals before the City's zoning boards that can have a long-lasting impact on your quality of life. Digital billboards have been creeping into our neighborhoods, but now there is a pivotal case coming up that may impact how large these can be and where they can be placed. If we lose this one, our landscape will be forever changed.
On city streets, these digital billboards emit intense, bright LED multi-colored images whose nighttime glare invades our nearby residential neighborhoods – images that are allowed to change every 8 seconds. The signs also are a distinct blight on our day-time and sunset mountain views of Camelback and Piestewa Peak. And drivers watching an image for 8 seconds or for a few seconds while waiting for the next display can cause a car/pedestrian or bike accident, or even just a traffic-snarling fender-bender. These billboards were intended to be along highways and in agricultural areas, and only rarely – if at all -- on our city streets that border residential neighborhoods.
What can you do?
4234 E. Indian School Road, ZA-486-17-6 (Sign). The illustration above demonstrates what we're up against (this is not the image now on the sign, but it could be – as could ads for alcohol, gas stations and more). This is a massive billboard that has been non-conforming with the Zoning Code for years, but it was less bright and less visible. It was re-built 2 months ago by Becker Boards which received city approval to increase its height and to vary from general setback standards because neighbors withdrew their opposition when Becker Boards testified that rumors of a digital billboard were false. But just 3 weeks after the initial approval of a higher billboard to be built in a setback area, they filed to convert this to a digital sign. Their request was denied on December 6, but they are appealing that denial. AONA and ACMNA are in opposition to the appeal. We need emails sent ASAP (this week if possible) to the following addresses; firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, and mary.L.email@example.com stating opposition to this billboard. Please put the zoning number ZA-486-17-6 in the subject line. In addition, we need as many people as possible to show up for the hearing on March 1 at noon in the Phoenix City Council Chambers, 200 West Jefferson. This is a watershed case, and if allowed to go forward will set a precedent for more and more large digital billboards on our city streets.
Please don't let these digital signs take over our lovely neighborhoods. If we don't speak up now, the precedent will be set and they will proliferate like rabbits. They are cheap to run, bring in revenue to the city, and sneak in claiming "public good" by offering a vehicle for announcements such as Amber and Silver alerts. Do you want one next door to where you now live? Would someone buy your home if it’s next to one? Do you want to look at changing digital color images from your yard or home every night? Speak up now please.
Proposed Licensing Program, Draft Ordinance and Stakeholder Meeting
At the direction of the Phoenix City Council, the city staff has developed a proposed licensing program and draft ordinance to regulate structured sober living homes. There are currently no regulations governing structured sober living homes in the city.
Public Input: Licensing staff will collect public input related to the proposed licensing program and draft ordinance during the month of February 2018. Staff will then make final adjustments to the program and ordinance as needed, prior to presenting staff’s final proposal to the City Council on March 21, 2018.
- Phone or Email: If you have comments, questions or any input related to the proposed licensing program and/or draft ordinance please submit them to the contact listed below.
- Public Meeting: A public meeting will be held to discuss the proposed program and draft ordinance.
- Date: February 22, 2018.
- Time: 4:00 p.m.
- Location: Phoenix City Hall: 200 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003.
- 1st Floor – Atrium in Assembly Rooms A & B
- Public Parking: Available in the City Hall Parking Garage at 305 W. Washington St.(southwest corner of Washington St. and 3rd Ave.).
Contact: If you have any questions about this notice or anything related to the proposed licensing program and draft ordinance, please contact City Clerk License Services Supervisor Denise Archibald at firstname.lastname@example.org or by calling 602-262-7003.
Notice: The Arcadia Camelback Mountain Neighborhood Association has three vacancies on the ACMNA Board that we are looking to fill. If you are interested or know of someone who is interested, please email email@example.com. by February 28th. Please include a bio on yourself as well as why you are interested in serving on the board. These board positions are two or three year positions. All applicants must reside within the Arcadia Camelback Mountain Neighborhood Association boundary. See About Us for more information
Our nominating committee consists of Karen Magnoni, Tristahn Schaub, Hillary Gurley, Brian Flader and Jody Moman. They will be reviewing the applicants and will then present the interested nominations to the community during our annual meeting on March 10 2018
Beginning September 1, 2017, 48th Street will be closed to all traffic on the north side of Thomas Road. Click Here for Details
If you have questions or concerns, please contact the project hotline at (480) 281-1506
This closure is for the water transmission pipe rebuild that is in progress along Thomas Road from 44th Street east to 64th Street. The expected completion for the entire project is summer of 2018.